teacup. [ 掲示板 ] [ 掲示板作成 ] [ 有料掲示板 ] [ ブログ ]


スレッド一覧

  1. 11(0)
  2. ハーゲンダッツの苦味成分と健康被害(0)
  3. 株暴落を手招きする投資家を絶対許してはいけない!(0)
スレッド一覧(全3)  他のスレッドを探す  スレッド作成

*掲示板をお持ちでない方へ、まずは掲示板を作成しましょう。無料掲示板作成

新着順:76/3526 記事一覧表示 | 《前のページ | 次のページ》

もうひとつの天皇家・伏見宮

 投稿者:Legacy of Ashesの管理人  投稿日:2017年 1月 6日(金)23時05分46秒
  通報 返信・引用 編集済
  http://angel.ap.teacup.com/applet/gamenotatsujin/msgsearch?0str=%82%A0&skey=%83%8D%83o%81%5B%83g%81E%83P%81%5B%83K%83%93&inside=1&x=0&y=0


日本海軍 400時間の証言・海軍あって 国家なし 投稿者 byzantine-basileus-z

「(伏見宮)博恭王(宮様)が9年間も軍令部総長」

「バックが宮様ですもん」

昨今、皇位継承問題でさかんに言及される「旧皇族」とはいったいいかなる存在か?
「昭和22年10月に臣籍降下(皇籍離脱)した11宮家」というのでは正解の半分でしかありません。正解のもう半分(より重要な半分)は「大正天皇の皇子である秩父、高松、三笠の三宮家(直宮)以外の宮家であり、それらはすべて伏見宮系皇族である」です。こうした初歩的な事柄を押えないままに、あれこれ論ずる向きもあるようですが、すべては「事実」を知ることからはじめるべきです。
伏見宮家と天皇家との血縁は、実はきわめて遠く、その分岐は南北朝時代までさかのぼらなければなりません。世襲親王家として中世から近世まで独自の位置を占めた伏見宮系皇族。その存在は、幕末の動乱を経て近代天皇制国家の成立後、徐々に数と重みを増し、変質してゆきます……。彼らと明治・大正・昭和天皇との関係はどのようなものだったのか、維新の元勲、重臣たちは宮さまたちの行状をどう見ていたのか……。
本書は、皇族・華族研究に打ち込んできた著者の、研究の集大成として世に問う企画です。皇室問題に関心のある方ならば必読の書といえましょう。

内容(「BOOK」データベースより)

かつて「皇族」とは、いかなる存在だったのか?中世に世襲親王家として分岐し、独自の位置を占めた伏見宮系皇族。幕末の動乱、近代天皇制国家の成立後、その存在は徐々に数と重みを増し、変質してゆく…。万世一系の舞台裏、明治天皇と元勲・重臣の葛藤、大正・昭和期の宮さまたちの意外な姿と皇籍離脱までを描く。

伏見宮海外ネットワーク

http://blog.nihon-syakai.net/blog/2013/12/2645.html

落合秘史~http://6707.teacup.com/gamenotatsujinn/bbs/1969

伏見殿~http://6707.teacup.com/gamenotatsujinn/bbs/index/detail/comm_id/2933

戦争が一番儲かるゲーム

http://blog.nihon-syakai.net/blog/2016/05/5638.html

日本の皇族に渡ったカネ

http://www.asyura2.com/0510/bd42/msg/1053.html

或る時、海軍軍令部長の職にあった伏見宮は、対米英強硬派、と言われて居た。

日本最大のスパイ「ヨハンセン」

http://www.asyura2.com/09/reki02/msg/456.html

fareast
?@psk337
牧野雪子は吉田茂の妻となり、吉田もモルガン=ロスチャイルドに寵愛され、出世街道を上昇して行く。雪子は麻生太郎首相の祖母である。ウオーバーグの庶子である白洲次郎はその監視役。

注:牧野伸顕

http://www.city.kashiwa.lg.jp/soshiki/280400/p010478.html

久邇宮徳彦王殿下(のち梨本宮守正王妃伊都子殿下御養子)

http://miyake.yaekumo.com/Kuni.html


日本・終戦・知られざる 7日間   2015/08/21/0900 投稿者 deslockhyperbasileus


何故早期に終戦を決断できなかったのか 1/2 投稿者 Tokiomate


何故早期に終戦を決断できなかったのか 2/2 投稿者 Tokiomate


あの時、原爆投下は止められた 投稿者 Tokiomate

いきなりアインシュタインの手紙が出てきますが肝心の内容が飛ばされています。それは原爆は航空機で運べるようなしろものではない,ということが。全力で地上起爆を隠そうとしていることがわかります。

関連記事;砕氷船理論

http://6707.teacup.com/gamenotatsujinn/bbs/3809

■戦前の日本、大日本帝国は真正保守不在のパヨク国家だった
http://tokumei10.blogspot.jp/2016/12/blog-post_932.html

以下は

http://aioi.blog6.fc2.com/blog-entry-3148.htmlさまより

つまりは国家社会主義に偽装した共産主義者たちの仕業。つまり近衛の仕業。この北朝=近衛の手先が大本であり、最初は海軍に入り込み、更に陸軍へも浸透。日本をソ連との軍事衝突を避けるように中国大陸では南進を選択し、中国国民党を疲弊化して中国共産党に天下を取らせた。その後、真珠湾攻撃で日米開戦にこぎつけ、海戦という海戦で負け戦を演じ、日本を弱体化した上でソ連に侵攻させ終戦。終戦後は米ソで分割統治して東日本を共産化する計画だった。

それを阻んだのが自由主義陣営の本家・本流の昭和天皇だった。そして、いち早い米軍の本土攻撃の開始、更にソ蓮の進入を阻み米国単独で終戦に持ち込む為に原爆を地上起爆、、、、その炸裂先は北朝のバックにいるイエズス会が国内本拠地にしていた広島・長崎だった。まぁ、ここまでの詳細な作戦を昭和天皇が考えたわけではないのだが、、、これにより、日本は南北二分化、共産化、内地人の虐殺とシベリア抑留が防げた。

管理人注;地上起爆に関して昭和天皇のアーウービデオが残っていて仕方がなかったと言っている。その裏を考えると分からないでもない。レーニンの敗戦革命論を身にまとった共産主義者たちの第二総軍が一億総玉砕を叫び徹底抗戦の構えの中広島に集め怪しまれないように学徒と一緒に地上起爆で一網打尽にしたいきさつは米国に覇権をもたらし日本の分割が避けられた意味で意味深である。そして日本はヒルのように米国につらいついていくのです。流石と言っては言いえて妙であるが元英国陸軍元帥の力であろう。これが明治以来結社に操られた真の姿であった、



そしてその地上起爆の仕組みは意外と単純なものであった。

http://6707.teacup.com/gamenotatsujinn/bbs/3755

戦前の日本は左翼国家 反日国家であった

http://www5d.biglobe.ne.jp/~anpoken/sub31.html

目次

http://www5d.biglobe.ne.jp/~anpoken/index.htm

大森勝久~アムネスティ・インターナショナル日本から「冤罪の可能性が最も高い7名の死刑囚」の1人に指定されている。

https://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?p=%E5%A4%A7%E6%A3%AE%E5%8B%9D%E4%B9%85&search.x=1&fr=top_ga1_sa&tid=top_ga1_sa&ei=UTF-8&aq=&oq=&afs=



小沢一郎の韓国公演

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%E5%B0%8F%E6%B2%A2%E4%B8%80%E9%83%8E%E3%80%81%E9%9F%93%E5%9B%BD%E3%81%A7%E5%A3%B2%E5%9B%BD%E5%85%AC%E6%BC%94&search_type=&aq=f



仁徳天皇陵

https://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?p=%E4%BB%81%E5%BE%B3%E5%A4%A9%E7%9A%87%E9%99%B5&search.x=1&fr=top_ga1_sa&tid=top_ga1_sa&ei=UTF-8&aq=&oq=%E4%BB%81%E5%BE%B3%E5%A4%A9%E7%9A%87%E9%99%B5&afs=

関連記事:アロンの杖とマナの壺

http://angel.ap.teacup.com/gamenotatsujin/517.html

http://8628.teacup.com/toraijin/bbs/1748

籠神社の御神体はイスラエルの三種の神器 の1つ「マナの壺」だっ ...... そして、中臣鎌足が藤原氏の祖となり、次男の不比等が 藤原姓を受け継ぎ、各地の古文献を没収して『記紀』の改竄に大きく関与したという。 ...なるほど,なるほど

http://8906.teacup.com/toraijin/bbs/419

マナカガミ?

http://8906.teacup.com/toraijin/bbs/367

私たちの祖先にヘブライ人がいたという証拠?

http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/leg1723/27169518.html

 アメリカの占領軍は仁徳天皇陵で何を探していたのだろうか。ヘブライ王国には我が国と同じように三種の神器が有ったと言う。それはモーゼの十戒が書かれ た‘石板’、‘アロンの杖’、そして‘マナの壷’と言われている。ヘブライ語でマナとはパンの事を言い、パンを入れるための壷を「マナの壷」言う。
私は占領後僅か一ヶ月と言う不安定な国情にも拘らず、危険を承知で探していたものは「マナの壷」であったと想像している。そして占領軍は仁徳天皇陵の後、 古市古墳群に移動し、仁徳陵の次に大きい応神天皇陵に向かったということから、マナの壷は見つからなかったのではないかと考えている........。

日本が世界一の金貸し国家へ

http://blog.nihon-syakai.net/blog/2015/04/4970.html

日本のフリーメーソン

http://angel.ap.teacup.com/applet/gamenotatsujin/315/clap

ロバート・ケイガンとPNAC

http://blog.livedoor.jp/genkimaru1/archives/2020081.html#more



James Woolsey Jr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._James_Woolsey_Jr.

PNAC Member

http://www.reasoned.org/e_PNAC2.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20070518002941/http://www.pgs.ca/index.php/Iraq/252

 Rebuilding America's Defences:Strategy,Forces and Resources for a New Century (1992年発行)

 The U.S must remain in the forefront of all research relating to the "art of warfare"including"the world of microbes"(advanced forms of biological warfare that can "TARGET"specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically usefull tool。(要約:人種別に効果のある,生物兵器は便利な政治的な道具となる。戦争と言う芸術の名のもとに)。
 これが,西ナイル熱,炭ソ菌,鳥インフルエンザ,エイズ菌,そしてタミフルの策略。世界人口の三分の二皆殺し計画の実行案である。これはけっしておふざけでも,冗談でもない。

 Further,the process of transformation,even if it brings revolutionary changes,is likely to be a long one,absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -like a new pearl Harbor。(要約:何よりも確たるものにするには,パール・ハーバーのような新たな悲劇的・壊滅的な仕掛けが求められる)。かつて記事にしたが現実に100発のサムソナイト爆弾(Micro Nuke)がロシアから消えている。

Rebuilding America's Defences

"REBUILDING AMERICA'S DEFENSES:

STRATEGY, FORCES AND RESOURCES FOR A NEW CENTURY"

A SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS

PREPARED FOR PHYSICIANS FOR GLOBAL SURVIVAL

Graeme MacQueen

Centre for Peace Studies

McMaster University
February 24, 2003

The purpose of this report is (a) to highlight the importance of the document, Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century (RAD); (b) to set forth the main principles of the document; (c) to draw attention to elements of the document that are crucial for our understanding of the impending war with Iraq. Since I have written the report with the likely Iraq war in mind, I have made no attempt to cover other important topics, such as proliferation of military bases, the challenge of East Asia, and the role of anti-ballistic missile defense.

My own reading of this document was prompted by Jay Bookman's September 29, 2002 article, "The President's Real Goal in Iraq," in The Atlantic Journal-Constitution. Bookman's article can be found at: www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/opinion/0902/29bookman.html. This site also gives access to RAD itself.

Where quotation marks are used in this report they indicate direct quotation from RAD.

Importance of RAD

RAD was published about one year before the 2001 attack on New York and gives us access to pre-9/11 strategic thinking associated with an important faction in the Bush government.

The report (c. 40,000 words in 85 pp.) was produced in September, 2000 by the Project for the New American Century, a private U.S. organization established in 1997 to create strategy for "American global leadership." Crucial to such leadership, in the view of members of the Project, is "American military dominance." American military dominance, which the Project wishes to see extend over every major region of the globe, is the topic of RAD: the document considers how it can be achieved and how it can be maintained throughout the 21st century, which the Project sees as the "new American century."

There are 27 Project Participants listed at the end of RAD. Bookman points out that six currently serve in the Bush Administration, most of them with responsibilities for military and foreign policy. Four have doctorates and two have law degrees. Paul Wolfowitz is the most prominent of the six. Although arms-length distance is established between the report and the listed participants, RAD gives its own lineage in a way that makes such associations clear. It announces itself as built upon the Defense Policy Guidance drafted in 1992. Since the DPG was authored by Wolfowitz for the Cheney Defense Department, it is clear that Wolfowitz and Cheney are deeply associated with the ideas set forth in RAD. It is very likely, in fact, that Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and Vice-President Cheney, as well as a host of less central figures, all subscribe to the basic ideas of RAD. Since this faction has enormous power in the military thinking of the Bush administration, the importance of the document is clear.

Bookman has given further reasons for accepting RAD's centrality to the Bush administration. He points to approximately five major initiatives of the Bush administration (such as the raising of defense spending to 3.8% of the GDP and the decision to opt out of the ABM treaty) that appear to have been taken directly from RAD. He also claims that the Bush administration's position on Iraq is easier to understand after a reading of RAD. I believe he is right.

Main Principles of RAD

Some of the following principles are stated explicitly in RAD, while others are assumed.

(i) The existing world order is a "benevolent order," characterized by relative peace and prosperity.

(ii) This world order was created, and is held in place, through preeminent American military power and can therefore be referred to as "Pax Americana" or "the American peace" (the Latin form is used 3 times in RAD and the English form 14 times).

?Pax Americana is good for America because it allows the fulfillment of American ideals ("freedom" and "democracy," though the meanings of these terms are not explored) and "interests" (neither defined nor explored)

?what is good for America is good for the world; hence Pax Americana gives its "blessings" to the world at large (there is no attempt to explore ways American interests might clash with American ideals and no attempt to explore ideals and interests among non-American peoples that might be legitimate and might not be served by Pax Americana)

(iii) The only alternative to Pax Americana is a bad world order characterized by the disorganized clash of states and the rise to power of states and imperial orders inimical to American interests and ideals.

?"United Nations" and "UN" occur altogether four times in the document: each mention is brief and three of the four references are negative and dismissive

?the term "Security Council" does not occur

?the expression "international law" does not occur

?the terms "treaty" and "treaties" occur altogether 9 times, referring to non-proliferation treaties, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, and the Anti-ballistic Missile Treaty: every reference is negative, stressing the inconvenience of treaties for Pax Americana

?the possibility of using, strengthening or developing institutions of global cooperation, whether related to policing, law, culture or anything else, is otherwise entirely ignored

?the importance of friends and allies is acknowledged, but it is assumed that the U.S. will exert dominance in such relationships

(iv) Although the United States is already the world's preeminent military power (for example, "the U.S. Navy enjoys a level of global hegemony that surpasses that of the Royal Navy during its heyday"), this preeminence should be increased. With the defeat of the Soviet Union the U.S. faces an opportunity for global dominance that might not come again. Far from permitting a "peace dividend" or military "procurement holiday," the U.S. must maintain its military spending at high levels, extending its control over regions of the world where such control is now weak and preparing to face rising military powers that may wish to exert dominance in their own regions.

?U.S. dominance in space (which reinforces all other forms of dominance and is by no means restricted to matters of defense) is crucial to Pax Americana and must be drastically increased; otherwise new technology may erode current American preeminence

?the U.S. must also dominate cyberspace

?the U.S. must remain in the forefront of all research relating to the "art of warfare," including "the world of microbes" ("advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool")

(v) Global dominance requires long-term planning, massive funding, the ability to take anticipatory action, the ability and willingness to intervene militarily anywhere in the world when it is needed, and constant innovation and research so that no other state power can extend its own control through technological developments that might "level the playing field."

Using RAD to Understand the Impending War with Iraq

(i) RAD affirms that U.S. military intervention in many regions of the world will be required for the foreseeable future. Defense of the homeland (i.e., what most people in the world probably understand by the word "defense") is listed by RAD as one of three major aims of the U.S. military, and my guess is that it is the cheapest aim to achieve. The other two major aims of the military are: to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars" wherever required and to "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated with shaping the security environment of critical regions." In other words, global policing, in the interests of the United States and with accountability to no supra-national organization, as well as the fighting of wars on foreign soil for whatever motive, are central tasks for the U.S. military system. I suspect that these tasks can be expected to consume the lion's share of "defense" spending.

(ii) The Persian Gulf region is a "region of vital importance" to the United States. The U.S. has longstanding "interests" (not explained in the document) in "the Middle East and surrounding energy-producing region." Because of these interests, a long-term U.S. presence in the area will be needed, probably extending beyond the passing of Saddam Hussein (Iran, for example, is a concern). More military bases should be acquired to service the region.

(viii) Although RAD asserts that there are crucial American ideals, it makes no serious effort to explain what these are or to show concretely how American military policy aims, has aimed, or will aim to assure the fulfillment of these ideals.

The expression "human rights," so important to the current discourse on Iraq, does not occur in the document.

(ix) RAD shows awareness of resistance to American military bases by people in several parts of the world, but it does not recommend closing the bases. There is no acknowledgment of levels of hostility to American military presence and intervention (among Muslims and others) so extreme that they may doom RAD's entire strategy. This is probably both because of willful blindness and because such hostility (as evidenced in the Pew Global Attitudes Survey of 2002) has increased significantly since the document was written.

Concluding Remarks

"Pax Americana" is not a new term. It was at one time commonly used for the post WWII global dominance (economic, political and military) of the U.S. It is modeled on "Pax Romana" or "Roman Peace," which refers to the condition of relative stability in the Roman empire from Augustus, the first Roman emperor, to Marcus Aurelius. The authors of RAD find "Pax Americana" useful because it indicates beneficent dominance (in effect: our domination of you will be good for us and good for you too). This is, of course, the usual claim of imperial intellectuals.

RAD says little about economic matters, being focused on military affairs, so we are not given access to the ideas of these thinkers on the precise relations between the economic and military spheres. American economic dominance of the world has eroded significantly since the post-WWII period. I assume (reading a certain amount into the frequent references to American "interests") that these thinkers regard military dominance as the key to winning back lost economic dominance.

What are the implications of RAD for our understanding of the invasion of Iraq? Currently, an atmosphere of fear is being induced in the American populace (duct tape, plastic sheeting, and the rest of it) through the claim that the government of Iraq--an evil human rights violator and proponent of terror--possesses weapons of mass destruction with which it may carry out aggressive actions against the United States. Substantial numbers of Americans (and non-Americans in the English-speaking West) have become convinced that defense of the American homeland is required, and that, under the extreme threat posed by WMDs, this defense may reasonably take the form of preventive military action.

RAD supports an entirely different interpretation of events. It suggests that Iraq is a case where routine "constabulary action" must now be permitted to escalate briefly to the level of minor "theatre war" in order to bring about "regime change," followed by "post-combat stability operations." All this is necessary because Iraq, a key player in a region of geo-political and economic importance to the U.S., is not sufficiently compliant, not prepared to take its place within Pax Americana. Human rights, terrorism, and possible aggression against the U.S. are largely irrelevant.

It would be difficult to argue that the Wolfowitz faction of the Bush administration is unaware of the difference between what it is telling its population and how it understands the situation.

RAD is sufficiently rich to provide the Western peace movement with a good part of its agenda for the 21st century. I will not pursue this idea here except to say that it is essential that the movement work to demonstrate the possibility of a world order that is neither the mindless and chaotic clashing of states nor the imposed, imperial order envisaged by U.S. planners.

Conspiracy of Silence

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=conspiracy+of+silence

おまけ





併せてご覧ください

ウォール街とボルシェビキ革命

(アントニィ・C・サットン)

http://www.nn.em-net.ne.jp/~komoda/index2.html

原文元記事

http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/index.html

パニックの裏には

http://www.nn.em-net.ne.jp/~komoda/index3.html

グローバル経済の支配

http://www.nn.em-net.ne.jp/~komoda/GPandGGpart3.html



同じ内容です






プロF アラビアのロレンス20161013 投稿者 okura1919ppp

アラビアのロレンスで拙稿を検索すると16件ヒットします~フリードマンのいうバルフォア宣言の関連ですが映画の最後にはサイクス・ピコ協定が出てきますがロレンスは知らされたいなかったということです。つまり英国の二枚舌外交に利用されていただけだったんですから。

アラビアのロレンスで検索した結果、16件見つかりました。

http://angel.ap.teacup.com/applet/gamenotatsujin/msgsearch?0str=%82%A0&skey=%83A%83%89%83r%83A%82%CC%83%8D%83%8C%83%93%83X&inside=1&x=0&y=0

過去記事~アラビアのロレンス

http://megalodon.jp/2009-0127-2220-14/angel.ap.teacup.com/gamenotatsujin/254.html

ロレンスはマゾヒストとの説もある

http://www.d4.dion.ne.jp/~yanag/kora10.htm

アウンサンスーチーの英国人夫はMI&のエージェント 夫マイケル・アリスは癌ですでに死亡

http://www.bllackz.net/blackasia/content/20170105T0413240900.html



おまけ~海上保安庁の船めし

http://www.iza.ne.jp/topics/politics/politics-10041-m.html

継続的なご支援をお願いしております

http://6707.teacup.com/gamenotatsujinn/bbs/3543



 
 
》記事一覧表示

新着順:76/3526 《前のページ | 次のページ》
/3526